Chemical management of aquatic macrophytes under simulated floodplain condition in mesocosms.

Floating natives (Eichhornia crassipes and Pistia stratiotes) and emergent exotic invasives (Hedychium coronarium and Urochloa arrecta) macrophytes grow as aquatic weeds in both natural and artificial floodplain areas in Brazil, where the chemical control should be researched. The herbicides glyphosate and saflufenacil, alone or mixed, were tested for weed control under simulated floodplain condition in mesocosms. Glyphosate (1,440 g ha-1), saflufenacil (120 g ha-1), or glyphosate (1,440 g ha-1) + saflufenacil (42, 84, and 168 g ha-1) were applied firstly; and 75 days after treatment (DAT), glyphosate (1,680 g ha-1) was applied as a follow-up treatment to control plant regrowth. An herbicide-free check was also used. Echhinornia crassipes was the species most susceptible to the different herbicides. Saflufenacil alone presented the lowest control on the macrophytes (≤45%) from 7 to 75 DAT, and in most cases they presented high regrowth rates, i.e., this herbicide was the least effective treatment in reducing the dry mass production of the macrophyte community. Glyphosate alone presented low efficacy to control H. coronarium (30-65%), but for the other macrophytes, it presented control peaks ≥90%, maintaining control levels ≥50% until 75 DAT. Glyphosate + saflufenacil, regardless rate of saflufenacil, caused similar damage to glyphosate in E. crassipes and P. stratiotes; however, in U. arrecta it caused 20-30% less injury. In contrast, these treatments provided the best control of H. coronarium. The complementary application of glyphosate was essential to improve the level of control of the first application, after plant regrowth.

Sensitivity of aquatic organisms to ethanol and its potential use as bioindicators / Sensibilidade de organismos aquaticos ao etanol e seu potencial uso como bioindicadores

The aim of this research was to evaluate the feasibility for the use of the organisms Lemna minor, Azolla caroliniana, Hyphessobrycon eques, Pomacea canaliculata and Daphnia magna as exposure bioindicators for ethanol (lethal and effective concentration 50% - LC50(I)/EC50(I)). Thus, the following concentrations were used 5.0; 10.0; 20.0; 30.0; 40.0 and 50.0 mg L-1 ethanol on L. minor; 25.0; 50.0; 75.0; 100.0; 150.0 and 200.0 mg L-1 on A. caroliniana; 0.3; 0.5; 1.0; 2.0 and 3.0 mg L-1 on H. eques; 0.05; 0.10; 0.20; 0.40 and 0.80 mg L-1 on P. canaliculata; and 40.0; 60.0; 80.0; 100.0; 120.0 and 140.0 mg L-1 on D. magna. An untreated control was also kept for all organisms, with three repetitions. The increase in the ethanol concentration elevated the electrical conductivity and decreased the water dissolved oxygen and pH. The ethanol LC50 for L. minor and A. caroliniana were 12.78 and 73.11 mg L-1, respectively, and was classified as slightly toxic; 1.22 mg L-1 for H. eques (moderately toxic); 0.39 mg L-1 for P. canaliculata (highly toxic) and 98.85 mg L-1 for D. magna (slightly toxic). Thus, H. eques and P. canaliculata have showed good potential for the use as ethanol exposure bioindicators on water bodies.

O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a viabilidade do uso dos organismos teste Lemna minor, Azolla caroliniana, Hyphessobrycon eques, Pomacea canaliculata e Daphnia magna como bioindicadores de exposição ao etanol (concentração letal e efetiva 50% - CL50(I)/CE50(I)). Assim, foram utilizadas as seguintes concentrações: 5,0; 10,0; 20,0; 30,0; 40,0 e 50,0 mg L-1 de etanol para L. minor; 25,0; 50,0; 75,0; 100,0; 150,0 e 200,0 mg L- 1 (A. caroliniana); 0,3; 0,5; 1,0; 2,0 e 3,0 mg L-1 (H. eques); 0,05; 0,10; 0,20; 0,40 e 0,80 mg L-1 (P. canaliculata ) e 40,0; 60,0; 80,0; 100,0; 120,0 e 140,0 mg L-1 para D. magna, todos com controle em triplicata. O aumento da concentração do etanol elevou a condutividade elétrica e diminuiu o oxigênio dissolvido e o pH da água. A CL50 do etanol para as macrófitas L. minor e A. caroliniana foi 12,78 e 73,11 mg L-1, respectivamente, sendo classificado como ligeiramente tóxico; para o H. eques, foi de 1,22 mg L-1 (moderadamente tóxico); 0,39 mg L-1 para o P. canaliculata (altamente tóxico) e 98,85 mg L-1 para D. magna (ligeiramente tóxico). Assim, o H. eques e o P. canaliculata apresentaram potencial para uso como organismos bioindicadores de exposição do etanol em corpos hídricos.